Garmin Vivofit vs Fitbit Charge HR


garmin-vivofit-vs-fitbit-charge-hrIf you ask anyone who knows about the fitness trackers, it’s obvious that Fitbit and Garmin will be on their list. Garmin has been into GPS navigators for decades now. However, this well-known brand has entered the fitness product range as well. Now talking about fitness bands, you must have certainly heard about Fitbit, one of the top player in the current market with few products. Both have their up and downs equally, so it is bit hard to choose the best among these two. To help you get out from the dilemma, we have made a comparison after a deep research. Read further to know.

Garmin Vivofit Vs Fitbit Charge HR

The comparison between Garmin Vivofit and Fitbit Charge HR is made after considering many factors like design, hardware, software, Activity tracker features and other utility features. Let us compare each of them in depth to help you come up with a better decision.

Design and Hardware

If you are looking for a stylish design, Garmin Vivofit is not at par with your expectations, as it looks like a normal rubber wristband. But, Charge HR, on the other hand, is a flexible elastomer material and has an appearance certainly more appealing than vivofit. The buckle in the case of Charge HR is made of outstanding quality steel that is surgical-grade in nature. Both brands come in various attractive colors, the features being a little different in some aspects. Vivofit comes with an LC (liquid crystal) display, which is not too comfortable if the outside conditions are dark, Charge HR has an OLED (organic light emitting diode) display that is bright enough, comfortable, and soothing for eyes.

Garmin Vivofit – 0 vs. Fitbit Charge HR – 1

Accessibility & Usability

Accessibility & Usability are the key components while buying any gadget.  Both of these devices come with a single button with which almost all tasks can be performed be it distance covered, steps taken, sleep tracking, calories burnt, syncing, etc. Both can track workouts. However, Vivofit can also track the number of floors you have climbed, has a caller ID facility, wherein you can check incoming notifications on the go. On the other your Charge HR gets connected to your Smartphone wirelessly and also displays time and zones.


The most valuable feature of Charge HR that makes a big edge over Vivofit is the heart rate tracking, which is one of the most important aspects in an activity tracker gadget. In the case you need to go for a separate vivofit heart rate monitor that increases its price two times and you may need to attach a chest strap as well if you opt for a monitor that costs less.

Vivofit has more manual functions and less user-friendly than Charge HR. It is well-automated, and you don’t need to bother about much of its functions and settings. Further synchronizing is certainly better in Charge HR as there are a lot of synchronizing issues in vivofit as in you need to have several attempts to connect to your system. Further, even if you connect you may face issues like app crash or discrepancies in data; this problem is comparatively less in Charge HR.

Garmin Vivofit – 0 vs. Fitbit Charge HR – 1

Activity Tracking and Syncing

In Charge HR, you have an add-on facility of real-time statistics, i.e., while you are working out, you can put the device into exercise mode and review your efforts at that particular time on your wrist itself so that you know the areas of improvement, and you can apply those in real time. Both Vivofit & Charge HR can be connected wirelessly to their respective apps for complete data and analysis. But, there is an advantage in vivofit: you also get badges for your current work, which lets you know about your achievements. Also, it reminds you if you have been inactive for a long time. For example, you may be sitting in the office and working in the same posture. It is a valuable feature, especially for people who have desk jobs. Also, it manage and track your sleep level and synchronizes your night statistics to illustrate their sleep trends using graphical representation.

Garmin Vivofit – 0 vs. Fitbit Charge HR – 1


If Garmin Vivofit vs. Fitbit Charge HR comparison of specifications is done, they have multiple things in common; however, they differ in some fields completely. Both come in different wrist sizes depending on the user.


  • Both can be synced via Bluetooth wirelessly for phones, tablets, etc. The display is different for both: Charge HR has an OLED display that is much better than Vivofit’s display using LCD.
  • Charge HR isn’t swim-proof whereas Vivofit is water resistant up to 50m. Hence, you can freely swim wearing it and track even while swimming.
  • The biggest edge that Charge HR has over vivofit is the inbuilt heart rate tracking feature. In fact, it is one of the most important tools that a sports person will need while working out is to know how much exercise his /her body can perform and how to increase the session gradually.

Check out our detailed – Fitness  Tracker comparison

Battery Life

Now we come on to a feature that makes vivofit quite convenient that is the battery. Vivofit uses two coin type cells that you can put in and forget to charge or replace the batteries for a year. Charge HR comes with a lithium polymer rechargeable battery where you have to charge it in a time span of 5 days, even though the backup is good. However, you have to carry a charger or a USB cable along and remember to charge it.

Garmin Vivofit – 1 vs. Fitbit Charge HR – 0

Support and Other Features

Garmin Vivofit does not have a silent alarm, a food log, has syncing issues, does not support Windows phones and a separate heart rate tracker has to be bought along that increases the price too much.

If we talk about Fitbit Charge HR, it has almost all the features that a gadget of this range should possess. So if you are not interested in heart rate tracking, the Garmin Vivofit is one of the most economical product, and moreover, Garmin as a brand speaks for itself as it has been manufacturing gadgets for more than the past two decades. Fitbit, on the other hand, specializes in activity trackers, so this factor cannot be ruled out and has to be kept under consideration while choosing.

Garmin Vivofit – 1 vs. Fitbit Charge HR – 0

Price & Warranty

Garmin Vivofit comes with an affordable price ranging from $49.99 depending on the deal you get. Charge HR, on the other hand, costs $129.99, making it quite expensive than Garmin Vivofit. However, if you go ahead and buy the heart rate tracker along with vivofit you will end up spending the same price what you have spent for Charge HR, and you will have to compromise and carry an external heart rate tracker along with a chest strap. Further, if you go with a heart rate tracker without a tracker may be you will end up paying even more than what you paid for Charge HR.

For Fitbit Charge HR and Garmin Vivofit the warranty is one year in the normal course, however, can extend up to two years if you purchase the product in a European Economic Area.

Garmin Vivofit – 1 vs. Fitbit Charge HR – 0

So, finally, as per user satisfaction level, both the fitness trackers have the best in market features and high accuracy in tracking the data. But Garmin Vivofit looks simple and economically affordable than Fitbit Charge HR. Also, there were customer issues we found in Fitbit that it is not syncing and tracking the heart rate properly, so it is better to go with low-end, simple fitness tracker than a high priced complex ones.

Also Read This: 15 Best Heart Rate Monitors And HRM Watches You Must Get Now!

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply